Kyle Brodziak
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f61d/0f61d5fe87b84af6f8cc89d61206345493f61aa4" alt=""
According the information compiled by LT, Brodziak looks to be a big part of the future here in Edmonton, and I don't see any reason he's wrong. The only issue is that which he shares with Glencross - not a lot of at bats to judge him by.
Now there's also been some talk (myself included) about Brodziak stepping in and helping to fill the heavy lifting roles vacated when Reasoner and Stoll left town. Tall task indeed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a321/6a321a802edff2fa82bafbe87529d4f4836102d6" alt=""
His G/60 was pretty damn impressive - 2nd on the team. But even that wasn't enough to come close to outscoring the opposition on average - I mean, his +/- wasn't bad, but if he had been getting, say, Sean Horcoff like ice time, it would have exploded.
Look, I'm not saying Kyle Brodziak isn't a good hockey player - or even that he won't be able to do the heavy lifting - but I think MacT needs to think long and hard about throwing Brodziak into the deep end right away. He still needs some swimming lessons.
Projection: 4th liner
Key Stat: 2nd overall in G/60, last in GAON/60
2 comments:
I think Brodziak gets the first shot at the role (after Penner gets moved out of it) because Craig MacTavish seems to have confidence in him.
Outside of that, his numbers from last season don't say good things about his odds of success.
I think you're right, but I'm thinking it could turn into a bit of a disaster, at least initially.
Post a Comment